PIMA MEDIA SERVICES LLC

King Paulson

I thought today Paulson was going to explain where our money is going. But all i heard from him is that he has decided to change the game plan.That’s something he can do since we gave him total control of the treasury.I as a citizen think there should be a total account of which company or bank is getting my money.

We cannot let him and the rest of his cronies just decide to change the rules.he is after all one of the people that caused the financial mess we are in.

He joined Goldman Sachs in 1974, working in the firm’s Chicago office under James P. Gorter. He became a partner in 1982. From 1983 until 1988, Paulson led the Investment Banking group for the Midwest Region, and became managing partner of the Chicago office in 1988. From 1990 to November 1994, he was co-head of Investment Banking, then, Chief Operating Officer from December 1994 to June 1998 eventually succeeding Jon Corzine (Governor of New Jersey) as its chief executive. His compensation package, according to reports, was US $37 million in 2005, and US $16.4 million projected for 2006. His net worth has been estimated at over US $700 million.

In 2004, at the request of the major Wall Street investment houses, including Goldman Sachs, then headed by Paulson, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission agreed unanimously to release the major investment houses from the net capital rule, the requirement that their brokerages hold reserve capital that limited their leverage and risk exposure. The complaint that was put forth by the investment banks was of increasingly onerous regulatory requirements — in this case, not U.S. regulator oversight, but European Union regulation of the foreign operations of US investment groups. In the immediate lead-up to the decision, EU regulators also acceded to US pressure, and agreed not to scrutinize foreign firms’ reserve holdings if the SEC agreed to do so instead. The 1999 Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, however, put the parent holding company of each of the big American brokerages beyond SEC oversight. In order for the agreement to go ahead, the investment banks lobbied for a decision that would allow “voluntary” inspection of their parent and subsidiary holdings by the SEC.

This just goes to prove the fox is watching the hen house!!

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

PIMA MEDIA SERVICES LLC Free Blog Themes and Free Blog Templates